home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
-
-
- Time for a Redefinition of Terms
- By AmadEUS
-
-
- I think it is time for a redefinition of our terms. We have seen the many horror stories
- about hackers who have been jailed for being where they should not be...so they say, listening in
- on phone conversations...so they say, being in possession of information...naughty, naughty. I
- have two words. 1) Kevin and 2) Mitnick. If you don't know this name, look it up on the
- Internet. You will see a great deal of verbage about this person. Some of says he is guilty, some
- says he is not guilty, and some says that he is both. Who is to say which is right. I guess only
- Kevin will truly know.
- There are some out there in CyberLand who take pleasure in destroying property which is
- not their own, being where they should not be, searching and learning, exploring and growing.
- I do not deny that there are vicious people out there who know how to do vicious things with
- their knowledge and display destructive behavior. Many people forget, however, that there are
- also people who want to learn from the information they find and are able to do this without
- destruction. I am not proposing that sides be chosen. I propose that we redefine ourselves.
- Those of us who are not destructive or malicious are often considered to be destructive and
- malicious because of ambiguous terminology. What do you think of when you hear the word
- "hacker"? Different people think different things. Some people do not know enough to think
- anything. Today we do not have just one word to describe persons of the digital-information
- persuasion. There are quite a few. We have names like: hacker, cracker, cyperpunk, and phreak,
- but what do these mean. Just as I indicated above, these are somewhat ambiguous. So, I
- reiterate... what do you think of when you hear these terms? Generally, those who do not know
- much about these types of people are incline to believe that a hacker, cracker, or phreak is a
- person with criminal or malicious intent. Those who are in the know, realize that there are good
- hacker, cracker, phreak, etc. people and bad hacker, cracker, phreak, etc. people. It seems that a
- large part of the world has not yet learned that bad people will tend to do bad things and good
- people will tend to do good things.
- In the pursuit of knowledge and information, we must be careful. It would be better if
- information was freely accessible and no one owned anything and we could get along with our
- neighbors foreign and domestic. Unfortunately, that is a luxury we do not possess. What do we
- have? To answer that question, I will use a message from the movie "Sneakers" to illustrate my
- point. We have too many secrets. There is tons of information out there. There are lots of
- people who are hungry for that information. The problem is that some of the information is
- hidden away and some is guarded. Is this fair? I happen to believe that there are some things that
- should be kept secret. If you stop and think about it, there is not too much that needs to be
- secret. There is some information that is useless to most people. There is some information that
- is personal private that you do not need to know. There is information that would allow us to
- evolve faster if more people new about it. I am sure you have heard the phrase, "knowledge is
- power". If you do not believe that this is true, you probably do not have a lot of knowledge. Let
- me give you an example of the power of knowledge. A man goes to a car dealer to buy a new car.
- The sales person gives him bits and pieces of information about the car. He tells the man how
- great the engine sounds. He tells the man that the convertible top can be closed by pushing a
- button. The sales person tells all about the bells and whistles of the car and say that the
- dealership even waxes the car with state of the art car polish and he will see that water bead up to
- prove how great the car polish is. The sales person says that he will even throw in a bottle or two
- of the car polish if the man buys the car today. They start talking about price. The man realizes
- that the price seems barely within what he can afford. The man thinks about all of the wonderful
- things that were mentioned about the car and considers that he is getting a couple of bottles of
- great car polish in the deal and decides to go for it. What the man did not realize was that the
- convertible top has to be put down manually. The alternator has been changed three times. There
- is a small crack in the radiator at the bottom that has been sealed twice. There are other engine
- parts that have been put in the car that do not match factory specification. If the dealer had told
- the man about these things, the man would not have purchased the car especially at the price he
- paid. If the man had read about car polishes, he would also have realized that a polish that causes
- the water to bead also causes damage to the car's finish because the beads focus the sunlight and
- will erode the finish. Without the knowledge of these things, the man got a bad deal. People
- who have more knowledge about cars, usually get better deals. This type of situation pops up in
- a lot of places. Who Shot Kennedy? What is at Area 51? How can you get free email? How do
- you send someone fake email? The answers are out there. Somebody knows. What if we knew
- what was at Area 51 or who shot Kennedy? If everybody knew, there would be consequences.
- There could be people who do not want to face the consequences, so they keep this information
- private. Some information is stumbled onto like how to send fake email. Someone somewhere
- figured out how to do it. Maybe it was by design or maybe it was a flaw in the program, but the
- fact remains that it is possible to do. Knowledge is power, but it comes with a price for many of
- us. If you figure out how to send fake emails to people, just knowing is not necessarily a bad
- thing. If you wrote death threats to the president, that would be very bad. If you found out what
- was at Area 51, do you think it would be safe if the government knew that you knew? This is
- why I say, "In the pursuit of knowledge and information, we must be careful".
- We are all information seekers. Whether it be a reporter trying to get pictures of a
- celebrity, a hacker trying new or different things with a computer, or anyone who is just curious.
- We should be categorized by what we do with information and how we get the information. I am
- a hacker. If I attain knowledge and learn new things without destroying anything, I don't want to
- be thought of as a criminal just because another hacker decided to use his or her knowledge to
- hang someone's computer or interfere in someone's life. We are hackers. We are crackers. We
- are phreaks. We are information seekers. Do not hate us for what we are. Do not lock us up
- because of what others do. People kill people. Do we hate all people?
-